Should Marijuana Be Legal Every State - 1894 Words

â€Å"Should Marijuana Be Legal in Every State?† Marijuana is also called weed, herb, pot, grass, bud, ganja, Mary Jane, and a lot of other terms in today’s world. It is a greenish- grey mixture of the dried shredded leaves and flowers of Cannabis sativa, which is the hemp plant. Some users smoke marijuana in hand- rolled cigarettes called joints, many use pipes, bongs, or marijuana cigars called blunts. (H. (2016, August). What is marijuana? Retrieved November 07, 2016). Marijuana is not only used for personal use but is sold legally and is consumed for medical purposes by people who have permission to do so. Marijuana is a controversial topic in today’s world because to legalize it in every state has brought up issues. Some states have done so and some still have yet to. Marijuana has been seen more as a recreational drug and not a hard-core drug which is why most people do not see it as a high- risk drug or to have longing effects on a person or the body itself. Since the 20th century, marijuana has been prescribed by doctors for use to deal with glaucoma and cancer. Being that it is legal for medical use but illegal to use on a federal government level will and has always set off two different sides of legalizing or not legalizing marijuana. Marijuana cannot and should not be in categories with drugs that can kill because there are no studies of marijuana killing a person. In addition to, some people think that because it is legal in some states then it is safe. TheShow MoreRelatedWhy Marijuana Should Be Legalized1014 Words   |  5 Pagesreason that marijuana should be legal is that there is no good reason for it not to be legal. Some people ask why should marijuana be legalized? but we should ask Why should marijuana be illegal? From a philosop hical point of view, individuals deserve the right to make choices for themselves. The government only has a right to limit those choices if the individuals actions endanger someone else. This does not apply to marijuana, since the individual who chooses to use marijuana does so accordingRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?972 Words   |  4 PagesMarijuana Legalization For thousands of years, marijuana has been used for a myriad of purposes ranging from medical use to recreational use. Although small steps are being for marijuana legalization across the country, there is still a long way to go. Some folks argue that marijuana is a gateway drug and impairs judgement, causing people to act recklessly. However, extensive studies have been conducted on the effects, risks, and benefits of marijuana, and have proven marijuana to be safer thanRead MoreLegalizing Marijuana1592 Words   |  7 PagesIn any civilized society, it is every citizen s responsibility to obey just laws. But at the same time, it is every citizen s responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Martin Luther King Jr. Many people ask â€Å"why should marijuana be legalized†? when the real question that we should be asking is â€Å"why shouldn’t marijuana be legalized†?. Marijuana also known as hemp is a naturally grown plant that has been around for decades dating ba ck to around 2697 B.C., when the Egyptians would use it to cure manyRead MoreOpposing The Legalization of Marijuana Essay733 Words   |  3 Pagesâ€Å"If marijuana was legal, back-yard marijuana gardens would be in every neighborhood, thus kids would be able to get it as easy as taking fruit off a neighbor’s tree† (Johnathan Greens). According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 62.2 percent of the 14.2 billion people who used marijuana for the first time in one day were under the age of 18 years back in 2003. This increases by nearly 1.3 percent every year. This has become a problem due to Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) being the activeRead MoreMarijuana: Good or Bad?1032 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿ Marijuana: Good or Bad? There has been a major debate on if marijuana should be made legal. Statistics show that about 443, 000 people die every year due to a tobacco related illness and there has been no evidence to support that there have been fatalities that are marijuana related. Tobacco is harmful to the lungs and can cause lung cancer, bronchitis, and emphysema. Jacques and van Luling (2013) explained that in 2010, 38, 329 people died from drug overdoses. Sixty percent of those wereRead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?1322 Words   |  6 PagesMarijuana is most often see as a detrimental drug, but to a great deal of people it helps cure diseases and/or relieve the pain from them. It helps relieve stress and anxiety to people who often have anxiety attacks or problems being in a social environment. Making marijuana legal could also help our overall economy if regulated. Most people think smoking cannabis is bad for your health when that is not entirely the case. Any type of smoking is bad fo r your lungs, but conveniently marijuana comeRead MoreThe Legalization Of Marijuan A Positive And Negative Effects On American Society849 Words   |  4 PagesThe legalization of marijuana can have many positive and negative effects on American society. State budgets are constantly looking for new avenues of revenue and ways to create new industry. The legal system in place is exhausted and unable to sustain the current rate of incarceration and enforcement. Our jails and prisons are overcrowded and law enforcement budgets are challenged every year trying to keep up with the enforcement of marijuana use, smuggling and production in addition to its otherRead MoreIt Is Time to Legalize Marijana1700 Words   |  7 Pagesis marijuana, and surprisingly it is all around us. Marijuana is even referred to in today’s media Mainstream media sources that people enjoy, like music, movies, and TV shows, do not even bother to leave the drug out of their system. Now being a young adult and having my own personal experience with the drug and knowing its effects on others, I wonder why it’s not legal. Why is it that this drug has become illegal all over the world? The debate to legalize marijuana in the United States of AmericaRead MoreEssay on The Benefits of Legalizing Marijuana1006 Words   |  5 PagesThe Topic of Legalizing Marijuana has been a very conversational argumentative issue in the American society; moreover in the American politics today. There are many good arguments on why Marijuana should be Legalize and my argument is based on facts and supporting details to prove why Marijuana should be legalize. The Legalization of Marijuana would be profitable to our government and economy, according to Evan Wood who is the founder of the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy; The URead MoreShould Marijuana Be Legalized?985 Words   |  4 PagesLegalize Marijuana Despite what people believe about marijuana, it hasn’t once proved to be the cause of any real issue. It makes you wonder what the reason as to why there is a war on drugs. Why is marijuana the main concern? Since the time that alcohol and tobacco became legal, people wonder why marijuana isn’t legal yet. The fact that marijuana is illegal is mainly caused by the amount of money, jobs, and pride invested in the drug war. Once the government starts anything, they stick to it. At

Does Religion Cause Wars Free Essays

There is a conventional belief among many individuals that religion is the main cause of the present and past wars inflicting torment within the world. However, many humans fail to see past that belief; they are unable to understand that religion is just a small factor amongst the many contributing to the cause of wars. In fact, religion is merely a tool and an excuse used to hide the need for power and sins of the human nature. We will write a custom essay sample on Does Religion Cause Wars? or any similar topic only for you Order Now Among these factors, it may be the misinterpretation of religious teachings and the differing ideals of many individuals. Unfortunately, these factors are often overlooked as most people view this issue with a simplistic mindset. The idea of religion is often able to bring peace and harmony within the world. In saying this though, religion may be twisted and exploited by individuals for either economic or political reasons, mostly with the blind ambition for power and control. Such people have used religion as a tool and an excuse in order to achieve their own personal desires. This is apparent with the previous Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein. The Iraqi president had aimed to persuade the Jihadists to start a holy war against the United States and British forces, who were seeking to dismiss him for his position. Saddam Hussein had publicly voiced his call toward the Jihadists in an Iraqi state television, where he encouraged them through his statement, â€Å"jihad is a duty in confronting them†¦ Those who are martyred will be rewarded in heaven. Seize the opportunity, my brothers† (Saddam Hussein). It is evident; however, that Saddam Hussein did not really view the war he intended to begin as a religious war. Instead he planned to use religion as an excuse for his own political gains, which was to maintain his position as president of Iraq. In conclusion, religion is not the sole reason of the previous and present wars within the world, it is also the people themselves who exploit and twist religion itself. Many individuals often find it difficult to give religion a precise definition. It is within their ability to understand the concept of religion yet are unable to provide an accurate definition of the word. Therefore, many may have their own interpretations of what religion truly is. This notion is similar to how individuals may have varying views in regards to the religious teachings of their religion. Sadly, in some cases, people may actually misinterpret the teachings of their religion, which can often lead to disastrous outcomes. Such consequences are evident with the infamous belief of ‘Jihad’. The concept of Jihad means â€Å"holy war† or â€Å"the holy struggle†. It also teaches that there shall be no use of violence â€Å"except in the case of defensive wars, wars which are waged to punish a tyrant, or those which are meant to uphold freedom† (Concept of Jihad, pg 2). Unfortunately, there are others who misunderstand the concept of Jihad and instead believe it to be complete submission to Allah, which further means they are â€Å"prepared to die (martyrdom) in the course of this submission†. Such cases usually result in terrorism and suicide bombings, where individuals believe that by forcing others into their religion, by death, will please Allah. The most known example of these occurrences is the September 11 suicide bombings where approximately two planes crashed into the twin towers in New York, USA. This event was not necessarily a war but was instead an attack part of the already ongoing war between the United States and the Islamic, terrorist group, Al-Qaeda. From this event it is evident that the members of Al-Qaeda had misinterpreted the concept of Jihad and instead violated the religion by using violence for unnecessary reasons. It can be concluded that even though religion may play a role in the cause of wars, it is not necessarily the only factor to blame but also the misinterpretation of the religious teachings of religions. It is not solely religion itself that spur the gruesome wars that have occurred throughout history, but also the varying ideals of the religious worshipers. Unfortunately, in some cases there is a chance that the ideals of certain individuals may have a larger influence on them than their own religious beliefs. Such terms are often confused with each other; however, there is a prominent difference between the two. Beliefs are set in stone already, statements or truths that humans have decided to place their confidence in. On the other hand, ideals are personal concepts of perfection; they have no boundaries unlike beliefs. When the ideals of humans have a larger power over them, the results often have a high chance of becoming cataclysmic. Such results are evident within Nazi Germany during the Second World War, after the 1930s. Germany had been under the dictatorship of a tyrant known as Adolf Hitler. Hitler was infamously known for his cruelty and mass murder towards the Jews in Germany at that time. His reason for his actions was that by protecting himself against the Jews, he was â€Å"defending the handiwork of God† (Mein Kampf, pg 60). Despite his religious reason, he had a deeper hatred towards the Jews and desired an ideal world, where there was only a majority of pure descendants of the â€Å"Aryan† race. The Aryan race involved humans with certain features such as blonde hair and blue eyes. Hitler believed that the Jews were contaminating his ideal race as they offered the â€Å"most striking contrast to the Aryan† (Mein Kampf, pg 259), thus leading to his revulsion towards the Jews. It is unmistakable that the beliefs of Hitler were not the only cause of his actions but also his extreme ideals, which had lead to the carnage he had incited. Therefore, it is not only religion itself that cause wars but also the differing ideals of humans. Religion is often unfairly blamed as the direct cause of wars throughout the world. It is often used as a scapegoat as many people cannot look past that simplistic view. Many individuals have never considered the possibilities of other factors contributing to such wars. A few of these factors are the exploitation of religion for the personal gains of individuals, the misinterpretation of religious teachings and the differing ideals of many humans. From these factors, it is evident that it is not just religion itself that causes the wars, but the people themselves also who actually wage these atrocities. Adolf Hitler (1998). Mein Kampf. United States: Houghton Mifflin Company PDF file viewed at – http://www. greatwar. nl/books/meinkampf/meinkampf. pdf Last accessed 26/2/12 A. Ezzati. 1986). The Concept Of Martyrdom In Islam . Available: http://www. al-islam. org/al-serat/concept-ezzati. htm. Last accessed 26/2/12. Coel Hellier. (2011). Nazi racial ideology was religious, creationist and opposed to Darwinism. Available: http://coelsblog. wordpress. com/2011/11/08/nazi-racial-ideology-was-religious-creationist-and-opposed-to-darwinism/#sec5. Last accessed 26/2/12. Dr. John Kelsay. (1999). THE RETURN OF THE RELIGIOUS WAR . Available: http://rinr. fsu. edu/fallwinter99/features/religiouswar. tml. Last accessed 26/2/12. Hadrat Mirza Gulam Ahmad. (1995). Jihad. The true Islamic concept. Available: http://www. alislam. org/library/articles/Jihad-Brochure. pdf. Last accessed 26/2/12 Jim Lehrer. (2003). Saddam Hussein Calls for Jihad. Available: http://www. pbs. org/newshour/extra/features/jan-june03/saddam_4-1. html. Last accessed 26/2/12 M. Amir Ali. (Unknown). Islam, Jihad, and Terrorism. Available: http://www. aboutjihad. com/terrorism/islam_jihad_terrorism. php. Last accessed 26/2/12. How to cite Does Religion Cause Wars?, Essay examples

Burkini Ban in France for Current Cultural Research- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theBurkini Ban in France for Current Cultural Research. Answer: The article, The French ban on burkinis at some public beaches" shows that as the popularity of burkini swimwear started spreading and became popular among the Muslim population in France, as it became a basis for the harsh controversy which started coming up. The use of burkinis had previously been eliminated and restricted as the French argued the burkini violated the countrys secular dress code and weakened the French customs and culture against being radicalized (Abdelaal, 2016). Furthermore, as the ban took effect by the intervention of the police and financial sanctions, the controversial issue had spread throughout the world as various world leaders elicited criticism towards the law enacted. Furthermore, many perceive that the restriction bears a negative impact on France, and any other country that adopts the ban, as it segregates the Muslim community from the daily activities of the society that could result to its members being radicalized and increased involvement in radical events and groups like Al-Qaida. Other states persons submit their proposals to have religion isolated entirely from the citizen's social life and restricting the use of burkinis is an excellent way to counter the regressive activities. The heat from limiting burkini use has escalated hate and attention toward Muslim people, especially the women. The article, The French ban on burkinis at some public beaches" by the Editorial Board from USA Today, speaks about a situation towards Muslim women wearing burkinis on the beach in France and the plan to ban them. The burkini is a swimsuit that covers up their legs, arms, and hair. It helps them enjoy swimming by enabling the women to cover up and show modesty. The French police are patrolling the beaches and telling the women to do away with their burkinis, and if they dont, they are asked to leave. These were banned in fifteen towns in France, including Nice and Cannes. One of the top French courts recently overturned on prohibiting the burkinis. Besides, it is not the first time that France has tried to ban any Islamic attire. They have also forbidden headscarves from public schools. Ever since Muslim immigrants have arrived in France, they have a negative attitude towards them. France believes that religion should be separated from the national identity altogether. No court shou ld be this cruel towards one and their faith or what morals they have. One of the assumptions from the article is that here in America we make use of the First Amendment to as a basis for actions against religion. It guarantees freedom about religion and prevents the government from curtailing the rights of one speaking openly. Even if it prevents it from intervening from peoples religion choice, it can still come back to be conflicting. The Supreme Court in America is not fighting to have burkinis, hijabs, or burkas to be banned from here. In addition, just as the article mentioned that America does emphasize the need for the people who believe in various faiths to pretend to conform to rules they are not able to and still be observant while being respectful to other religions. Nevertheless, that is not happening towards the Muslim community. Even if it may have many contradictions, the United States way versus the Frenchs way of forcing secularism is apparently much more suitable. Individuals have the right to practice what he or she believes in their own homes and any religious organization. Every day you hear something on the news about Islamophobia or something related to that. It is becoming more violent here in the U.S., for example, this week a Muslim woman was burned to death in New York City because she was wearing a burka, which is a veil that covers everything including the face. There have also been incidents where people are fighting the women and trying to remove their masks so their face can be shown. Apparently, our country has seen and gone through terrorist attacks, but you dont see our government trying to ban Muslims or Islamic faith like the French. Ever since their attacks, thats one of the biggest and main reasons why they are trying to go forward with these bans. Being a Christian with the Catholic faith, the clothing issue appears concerning the clothing that Nuns wear. Its the same thing as they show what they believe in and still showing modesty because of their faith. It is always covering their hair, arms, and legs. The only difference is that they are not hiding their face. I hardly ever hear of nuns being discriminated or disrespected because of how they dress. The same thing goes for the surfer suits and scuba diver suits. These are almost identical to the burkini, and they dont get a word said to them about it. If thats the situation, then we should ban all of the clothing that is similar to Muslim wear. It is questionable as to when America started telling people what to wear or what to believe in concerning religion. The citizens have the right to choose what we want to wear. If the United States started finding women and telling them to take off their swimsuits, that would be contradicting and them abusing the First Amendment and not only being prejudice towards the Muslim women. The French should be happy and okay that there are people showing modesty by covering up and not showing too much out in public since they care so much about how revealing it can be. If France doesnt accept people showing modesty and covering up, then they should get rid of their nude beaches because they are hypocritical. A Muslim should be able to wear what they want as well as a Christian or Catholic have the same right to wear what they desire. Justice needs to be made from the French court, and hopefully, this never happens in America (Berg Lundahl, 2017). The article makes one read about the various perspectives in the world concerning the ban imposed on the use of burkins. The section has the ability to change an individuals focus on the issue entirely once they learn how the punitive restrictions by the state can shift and alter the societal equilibrium. Template for Drawing Conclusions: I Read/I Think/Therefore I Read I Think The article, The French ban on burkinis at some public beaches" by the Editorial Board from USA Today, speaks about a situation towards Muslim women wearing burkinis on the beach in France and the plan to ban them. The burkini is a swimsuit that covers up their legs, arms, and hair. It helps them enjoy swimming by enabling the women to cover up and show modesty The French police are patrolling the beaches and telling the women to do away with their burkinis, and if they dont, they are asked to leave. The burkinis were banned in fifteen towns in France, including Nice and Cannes. One of the top French courts recently overturned on prohibiting the burkinis. Besides, it is not the first time that France has tried to ban any Islamic attire. They have also forbidden headscarves from public schools. Ever since Muslim immigrants have arrived in France, they have a negative attitude towards them. France believes that religion should be separated from the national identity altogether. (vox.com) No court should be this cruel towards one and their faith or what morals they have. One of the assumptions from the article is that here in America we make use of the First Amendment to as a basis for actions against religion. It guarantees freedom about religion and prevents the government from curtailing the rights of one speaking openly. Even if it prevents it from intervening from peoples religion choice, it can still come back to be conflicting. The Supreme Court in America is not fighting to have burkinis, hijabs, or burkas to be banned from here. In addition, just as the article mentioned that America does emphasize the need for the people who believe in various faiths to pretend to conform to rules they are not able to and still be observant while being respectful to other religions. Nevertheless, that is not happening towards the Muslim community. Even if it may have many contradictions, the United States way versus the Frenchs way of forcing secularism is apparently much more suitable. Individuals have the right to practice what he or she believes in thei r own homes and any religious organization. Therefore The article makes one read about the various perspectives in the world concerning the ban imposed on the use of burkins. The section has the ability to change an individuals focus on the issue entirely once they learn how the punitive restrictions by the state can shift and alter the societal equilibrium. Reference Abdelaal, M. (2016). Extreme Secularism vs. Religious Radicalism: The Case of the French Burkini. ILSA J. Int'l Comp. L., 23, 443. Berg, L., Lundahl, M. (2017). (Un-) veiling the west: Burkini-gate, Princess Hijab and dressing as struggle for postsecular integration. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 8(3), 263-283.